The
Original Bioneer:
An Interview with Kenny Ausubel
|
|
Kenny
Ausubel and his wife and partner Nina Simons founded the Bioneers
Conference, which is held annually in San Rafael, CA and is beamed
via satellite to locations across the continent – including
Traverse City. The conference is a gathering of scientific and
social innovators who have demonstrated visionary and practical
models for restoring the Earth and its communities. Kenny is an
award-winning journalist, filmmaker, author, and environmental
entrepreneur.
Thirdeye
had the opportunity of asking him some questions about Bioneers
and the current state of the world.
TE: Can you fill
us in on the thought process that led to the creation of the Bioneers
Conference in 1990?
KA: Well, where to begin…
I had a personal health crisis when I was about 19 and it was
unable to be helped with conventional medicine. So, out of desperation
I turned to alternative healing methods and got some relief. As
a result, I became very interested in alternative medicine, had
a lot of benefit from using it over many years, and in the course
of that I moved to a small farm in New Mexico and learned to grow
my own food organically. In the midst of all of this, my father
died from cancer at a very young age, and I ended up investigating
alternative cancer therapies. I made a feature documentary released
in 1987 called, Hoxsey: When Healing Becomes a Crime, about the
politics of medicine. It focuses on the Hoxsey treatment, which
is basically an herbal treatment that was once very famous in
the U.S... What I learned from studying this big conflict between
conventional medicine and natural medicine is that what Hoxsey
and all the natural medicines were actually saying was: “It’s
really nature that heals.” And that, to me, became the underlying
philosophical principal for Bioneers, which is this idea of working
with nature to heal nature. By imitating nature we can participate
in that process and live much better on the planet then the ways
that we are now.
Meanwhile, in the middle
of doing Hoxsey, I was asked to make a film about a very unusual
garden on an Indian pueblo north of Santa Fe, near where I lived.
It was there I met Gabriel Howearth, a master gardener who had
been traveling all over the Americas studying traditional indigenous
farming practices. The peoples with whom he apprenticed gave him
what, for them, was the most precious of gifts; the gift of seeds.
So Gabriel had planted this incredible arc of biodiverse seeds
at this garden in San Juan Pueblo, and although I’d been
a little farmer and gardener and all that, I’d never seen
anything like this. What I really learned, is that diversity really
is the fabric of life. It is what nature uses as a failsafe mechanism
against extinction and as a response to change. So Gabriel and
I ended up getting together a couple of years later to co-found
a company called Seeds of Change.
So here was this Hoxsey
thing, and while it wasn’t a cure-all or magic bullet for
cancer, it was certainly part of a solution, and then here’s
this little company Seeds of Change trying to respond to the loss
of diversity in our food system, and I realized there must be
other people who have looked to nature as a teacher and mentor.
And that was really the genesis of the Bioneers conference in
1990. I was actively seeking out what I came to call Bioneers
– biological pioneers who were looking for nature’s
operating instructions. And that was what the first conference
was about; to bring all these people together and start to see
what we were learning. From the very beginning my wife and partner
Nina Simons co-produced the conference with me, and we’ve
been doing it ever since.
TE: What
made you decide to do it in California, and what made you feel
that the conference type setting, with an array of speakers would
best serve your purpose?
KA: Well, I had literally
never been to a conference before I started Bioneers, and in a
way that was an advantage because I didn’t know what you
were supposed to do. So I just created something that was interesting
to me, and brought together all these very fascinating and talented
people. I liked to learn, so I learned everything I could about
their work, and when I introduced them I would give some context
about what they are working with or what the problem was that
they were solving. So that evolved over many years into a format
that’s pretty unusual in the sense that we present a lot
of context for speakers, we don’t just throw them up on
the stage. And so that has proven to be a good way of going about
it. And the first three years of the conference we did hold it
in Santa Fe, but each year it just kept growing, and after the
third year it was just getting too big. There were no facilities
in Santa Fe that could accommodate it, so we moved it to the Bay
Area because that is the hotbed of innovative thinking and a lot
of brilliant environmental work.
TE: In addition
to the Hoxsey treatment and the work of Gabriel Howearth, what
spurred you on the path toward advocating the type of change espoused
by the Bioneers?
KA: One influence
is John Todd who built what he calls living technologies, where
he modeled how nature treats waste; because in nature the concept
of waste doesn’t even exist. So John used living organisms,
microbes and plants, and actually animals – fish and other
mammals – to treat sewage, septage, oil waste, and all kinds
of other nasty toxic materials. He was a deep, deep influence
on me. Another trigger, was that in 1988 James Hansen from NASA
testified before congress and talked about global warming. My
brother Jesse had been working on global warming for National
Academy of Sciences starting in 1976, so when we heard James Hansen’s
testimony before congress, we knew. We knew it was coming and
we knew it was very, very serious. So I realized we had to start
looking for solutions, and that, from day-one, has always been
the focus of Bioneers. One dimension of that approach is technological,
but that’s not really ultimately going to solve things.
My belief – which came to me through being exposed to Native
American culture – is the understanding that we are the
environment; there is no separation. It’s really about a
change of heart on our part, of understanding ourselves as being
a part of nature rather than being apart from it. The Biologist
E.O. Wilson talks about a word that he came up with called “biophilia,”
which is the idea that life has an affinity for life, and that
by really appreciating what we love we’re going to save
what we love. So a lot of this is about human beings as a species
coming back to those original instructions that we’re part
of all this. We didn’t invent nature, nature invented us.
TE: Did
you ever imagine the conference would grow and evolve the way
it has… spawning media outreach programs, a Moving Images
Festival, 16 beaming Bioneers conferences around the nation, and
a series of books?
KA: To be honest,
from the very beginning I envisioned the whole media part of it
– the radio series, the book series, reaching out to the
press, getting the stuff into the mass media. But what was a complete
surprise was the growth of the conference itself, I don’t
think I ever imagined how big it would get. And I never ever foresaw
the beaming Bioneers program. At the first conference there were
all of 200 people – which seemed huge at that time –
and I figured these people are all working along the same lines
and they must know each other. What I discovered was that hardly
anybody knew each other, even if they were working in the same
field. And over time the conference became this huge networking
event. A lot of interesting cross-pollination occurred and collaborations
came from that. And so, I guess six or seven years ago, this person
from Toronto came to us and said, “I want to bring this
work back to Toronto, can you beam this up by satellite?”
It took about a week for it to sink in, and then I said, “That’s
a great idea!” Because the whole point to me was not to
just keep building a bigger and bigger event, but to actually
be like a seed-head and spread it. We all live in a place, and
we need to take care of our place. So I loved the idea that we
could beam in some of the plenary speakers, but then the people
on the ground locally could then adapt it for their own needs.
TE: Was
there anything seemingly providential about how all of this developed?
KA: There’s
tremendous synchronicity, and if you’re paying attention
things are revealing themselves to you right in front of your
eyes. Fred Kirschenmann, who’s a very wonderful biodynamic
farmer, gave a talk at Bioneers a number of years ago, and he
said that farming was really like dancing – sometimes you
lead and sometimes you follow. And that’s kind of how I
approach the work that we do. Sometime we lead and we say we’re
going to go in this direction, and sometimes we just wait to see
what events are showing up. Sometimes the Universe speaks and
says, “OK you need to go in this direction.” Like
with the satellite thing.
TE: What
do you feel sets the Bioneers apart from other environmental or
social movements?
KA: Well a couple
of things. I think number one: the focus on solutions. So much
of the environmental movement has been focused on the problems.
And that’s important, we’ve got to understand the
problems. But at the end of the day, we have to move beyond the
problems into solutions, and then we have to move beyond the solutions
into action. And so I think that’s one element. To explain
the other very fundamental thing about Bioneers, we use this term:
“declaration of interdependence.” The understanding
that we are a part of the web of life. And therefore, when you
really grasp what that means from a biological point of view,
what you also realize is that all the issues are connected. There
really are not single or separate issues. If there are people
who live on two dollars a day or less, we can’t solve the
environmental crisis without addressing poverty and inequity in
the world. So I think that’s partly what’s very different
about Bioneers, is we’re bringing all the pieces together.
It’s this fundamental idea that it’s all connected
and that we’re all connected.
TE: For
average people, especially young people, who want to make the
world a better place, what is your advice on how to plug in without
wasting energy on lost causes?
KA: Everyone
needs to recognize that we are truly in a crisis. This is the
first time in history that this has ever happened. We have the
ability to destroy the conditions conducive to life on a global
scale. I mean, it’s happened to at least five or six previous
civilizations, but it was always localized. Basically, when people
exceeded their ecological limits, their societies very quickly
declined and often became extinct. But never before has it been
globalized. This is the real deal, and we all have to get involved.
So I think the first thing you need is a commitment to get involved,
and from there it’s going to be very different for each
person. My advice is basically to educate yourself, and in the
process of educating yourself find out where your heart really
resonates. Maybe you especially care about water or animals or
social justice or health. Once you’ve zeroed in on what
your real passion is, think about what your personal gifts are
and then get connected. Find out who’s working in those
fields, what cool groups or individuals are out there, and approach
them and see if there’s a way you can get involved. Either
in your community or on a national scale, or whatever is right
for you. Perhaps it’s going to the Traverse City Bioneers
and meeting someone there. I’ve heard stories of people
who went to a Bioneers conference, got really lit up by it and
met somebody, and now they’re working for that group or
they’ve found their path. But once you set that intention,
things will happen and you just have to have confidence in that.
I think in the world right now we face attention deficit disorder,
and we need to resolve that. We need to set a very strong intention
that we’ve got to get together and solve these problems,
and then things will take care of themselves.
TE: Can
you elaborate on the concept of restoration as being the guiding
principle of the Bioneers, versus sustainability?
KA: You bet,
and I want to acknowledge Paul Hawken who is really the one who
keyed into this about ten years ago or so. Sustainability is the
midpoint between two eternal cycles in life – destruction
and restoration. Things are always dying and things are always
being born. If you are a gardener you understand that through
the process of composting. Sustainability is really the midpoint
between those two processes, and the real idea of it is simply
that you leave the world a little better than you’ve found
it. That you give back as much as you take. The problem is that
as a species we’ve done so much damage that the world is
radically degraded; ecosystems are breaking down. So it isn’t
really enough to just sustain what we have right now, we actually
need to give back more than we’re taking, because there’s
a lot to restore before we can get back to that midpoint of sustainability.
TE: There
has been much comparison with the Bioneers movement and a worldwide
popular movement described by Paul Hawken in his forthcoming book,
“Blessed Unrest.” What is this global movement and
how do the Bioneers relate?
KA: What Paul
has documented is literally the biggest movement in the history
of the world. He’s done a whole web database search and
come up with somewhere between one and two million groups worldwide
like Bioneers, like what you guys are doing in Traverse City,
everywhere. Most of it is coming through civil society, through
the nonprofit sector. I witness more and more of it coming into
local and regional governments. It’s cross-cultural, it’s
every race and culture on the planet, and what it’s fundamentally
about is taking care of our ecosystems and restoring our environment.
It’s about justice. It’s about having equity in the
world and a sense of reciprocity, and, as Paul describes it, it’s
a movement of movements. So you can break it out into all these
different categories, like the environmental movement, or the
social justice movement, or the peace movement, but it’s
bigger than any one of those and bigger than even all of those
put together. And it’s very decentralized, it’s not
hierarchical in the traditional sense – although there are
many, many leaders. Biologists say that the surest way to heal
an ecosystem is to connect it to more of itself. And that’s
what we’ve been doing partly through Bioneers; not only
putting out the solutions but helping people get connected. In
a sense, Bioneers are a microcosm of this larger movement, because
we represent all the different issues and many different points
of view. We don’t say or believe that there’s one
way to solve a problem; there are many, many approaches and we
need all of them. What you understand when you look at ecology
is it’s all made up of different little niches, and everything
depends on everything else. So what we present at Bioneers is
kind of a social ecology, of many different approaches, some of
which sometimes even contradict one another.
TE: Up to
now, Bioneers has been very comprehensive and worked very hard
on forming connections between activists working on a myriad of
issues. Are there any plans to zero in and focus on some more
specific issues or areas of concern as things become more pressing,
or are you going to maintain the same kind of holistic approach?
KA: Well I think
that we’ll always maintain the holistic approach, and at
the same time you have to stay open to whatever life may throw
at you, so we don’t really know. But we’ve been in
a process internally of just drilling down and going deeper and
deeper into different areas – like water, like energy, like
food and farming, like public health – and continuing to
build these networks. And we’re trying to sort of bring
together more and more coherence to those networks, and gather
some of the key learnings from those different sectors. What we’re
witnessing right now, the kind of thing that’s going on
in Traverse City, is actually the most important direction that
the work is taking, and that’s localizing the work. I believe
that if we’re building a long-term movement that’s
truly going to be sustainable, it must come from the ground up.
And that’s not to negate leadership at a national level
or anything of that nature, but if you build it from the ground
up then it’s going to have strength and durability. And
then what we also need to do at the same time is get connected
horizontally, across all of our local communities, so we can share
what we’re learning and share solutions and get to know
each other as well. So I think that the localization is a major
trend. We’re looking at doing some work in New Mexico, which
is where our main face is – that’s where we all live
and so forth – and so we’re very interested in getting
more involved in our place and seeing how that goes.
TE: It seems
in life it often takes catastrophe to catalyze individual growth.
In the same way, do you feel the types of global catastrophes
we’ve been discussing have the potential to force our species
to enter a new period of worldwide Renaissance?
KA: I do. David
Orr, who’s been the dean of environmental studies at Oberlin
College, suggested there’s a global ecological enlightenment
underway. In a sense, we’re getting an environmental education
the hard way with Katrina, or the tsunami, or all these things
that are happening. What’s becoming clear is that we can’t
avoid these issues; I think there’s been a lot of denial
that there’s a problem, and my own perception is that’s
lifting pretty quickly. There’s a pretty big push to start
changing how we do business and how we live on this Earth. Global
warming is absolutely pushing that. It was very encouraging to
me to see how many people have gone to see the new Al Gore movie.
And there’s tremendous changes happening in industry as
well. Green technology, green chemistry. There’s so many
advantages for the companies in this regard, because 94% of our
industrial system is waste. And if you look at that differently,
there’s a huge business opportunity because waste is very
costly, and there’s a lot of liability involved. So companies
like DuPont and 3M, the big dogs, are very interested in green
chemistry, which basically is harmless. That’s the whole
point of it, that you don’t produce these toxins, that you
don’t produce this waste in the first place. So I think
that there will be an important drive coming from business over
the next five or ten years and the world’s going to look
very, very different. And we’ve obviously got to make the
transition to renewable energy as quickly as we possibly can.
It’s still stuck in a lot of politics, but I think it is
shifting and it will continue to shift.
TE: Is there
anything else you’d like to tell activists in the Great
Lakes region?
KA: Well, I
just want to thank all of you for your inspiration, for really
taking care of your place, for taking care of each other, and
for educating people. What you’re doing is so important,
and we’ve got to take the long view here. So much work has
already been done and it’s going to continue to accelerate.
So I think there’s a tremendous amount of hope coming out
of people exactly like you, and we are everywhere. It’s
important that we keep on keeping on, get better connected with
each other, and keep the faith.
Part of what
I’ve seen in Bioneers is that the solutions residing in
nature continually surpass our perception of what’s even
possible. There’s great hope in the sense of how little
we know at this point; we’re really just learning. And there’s
great hope in the little that we do know; these solutions are
incredibly powerful. We’re also witnessing what John Todd
calls, “human ingenuity wedded to the wisdom of the wild.”
That people are so brilliant and so creative, and so many people
have so much courage and so much heart, so all over the world
right now there are these explosions of creativity. People are
coming together in community, and that’s really where our
ultimate social security lies. What’s going on in Traverse
City is one of the great models to me of just exactly where the
hope is.
|
Back
|